Arc Flash Certification
NFPA 70E & OSHA Compliance Consulting
Direct line
(813) 725-0999
Office hours
Mon–Fri 8am–6pm ET
Audits Programs Procedures DC Systems Training Compliance About Contact
Nationwide — onsite & live virtual
The practice

Rick Hauf, CSP

Certified Safety Professional · 35+ years in EHS and electrical safety

This is a one-principal practice, and the principal does the work. When you engage Arc Flash Certification you get the person whose name is on the report writing the report, walking the site, and standing in front of your electricians — not a coordinator, a subcontractor, or a template with your logo dropped into it.

The practice exists because most electrical safety documents in American workplaces are accurate and useless at the same time. They restate the standard correctly and tell nobody what to actually do on Tuesday morning. Interpretation is the product here: what the requirement means for your program, your roster, your records and your exposure.

Talk to Rick directly→
(813) 725-0999
Rick Hauf, CSP
Rick Hauf, CSP. Onsite and live virtual delivery, nationwide.
Scope of practice

What this practice does, and what it does not do

The boundary is stated up front, on every page of this site, because a consultant who is vague about scope costs you money later. There are firms that do the engineering side well. This is not one of them, and it does not pretend to be.

Stated plainly
Procedural and auditing work only. We do not perform incident energy analysis engineering studies, and we do not produce arc flash labels. We review existing studies, audit labeling, and write the procedures and training around them.
What we do
Compliance audits against NFPA 70E 2027 and OSHA 29 CFR 1910 and 1926
Written electrical safety programs
Energized work procedures, permits and LOTO documentation
DC, battery and PV procedure work under the 2027 Chapter 3 articles
Review of an existing incident energy study — and an audit of the labeling built from it
Qualified person training, onsite and live virtual
Training records, rosters and retraining structure that survive a records request
What we do not do
Incident energy analysis engineering studies
Short circuit and coordination modeling
Producing or printing arc flash equipment labels
Stamped engineering deliverables
Equipment supply, PPE sales or product recommendation for commission
Legal opinions on what the law requires of your organization
If a study is what you need, we will say so in the first conversation and tell you what to ask a study house for. That call costs nothing and saves a scoping cycle.
Credentials and record

Thirty-five years, and a classroom that is still full

The Certified Safety Professional credential is administered by the Board of Certified Safety Professionals and carries examination, degree, experience and continuing-education requirements. It is the qualification that separates a safety professional from a safety enthusiast, and it is maintained, not awarded once.

The teaching volume matters more than it looks. A consultant who only writes documents drifts away from the shop floor. Standing in front of electricians every week is what keeps the procedures we write executable by the people who have to execute them.

On these numbers
These are practice figures, drawn from our own training records and course evaluations, current to August 2026. They are the only performance numbers on this site, and they are ours — not industry averages, not projections, and not borrowed from anyone’s marketing.
CSP
Certified Safety Professional — Board of Certified Safety Professionals
35+
Years in EHS and electrical safety, across industry and consulting
500+
Electrical workers trained in the past six months — practice training records, six months to August 2026
55+
Classes delivered a year, onsite and live virtual — practice training records, 2026
9.6 / 10
Average student rating across delivered classes.
Source: practice course evaluations, collected at the end of each delivered class, current to August 2026. Students are asked to score the class before they leave the room, which is a harder audience than a follow-up email.
Where the work has been done

Organizations that have cleared us to say so

Five names, listed because those clients have cleared their use. There is no logo wall here and there are no unnamed silhouettes standing in for engagements that cannot be described. If a client is not on this list, we will not hint at them.

The mix is the useful part: hyperscale data center, refining and petrochemical, heavy process manufacturing, a public power utility, and food and beverage production. Different regulators, different equipment, the same underlying question about who is qualified to do what.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Data center environments
Exxon-Mobil
Refining and petrochemical
International Paper
Heavy process manufacturing
Salt River Project (SRP)
Public power utility
Gallo Winery
Food and beverage production
Client names appear here only with clearance. Engagement details are confidential unless a client has agreed otherwise in writing.
Case studies
Published only with written client clearance
[CLIENT CASE STUDY — to be supplied]
Placeholder. Sector, scope, findings and outcome to be written from a real engagement once the client has cleared publication.
[CLIENT CASE STUDY — to be supplied]
Placeholder. Sector, scope, findings and outcome to be written from a real engagement once the client has cleared publication.
These blocks are deliberately empty. We will not write an illustrative engagement, a composite client, or a plausible-sounding outcome to fill a page. When a real one is cleared, it goes here with the client named.
How the work gets done

Interpretation, not restatement

Anyone can tell you what a standard says. The standard already says it, and it says it better. The question that earns a fee is what the requirement does to your organization — which document is now wrong, which role is now unstaffed, which record would not survive being asked for, and in what order to fix it.

The test we apply
Every finding we issue has to name a document, a role or a record. “Non-compliant with 110.3” is not a finding. “Your program does not assign the qualified-person determination to a named role, so no one is making it” is.
Findings you can act on without a translator
Reports are written for the person who has to fix the thing. Priority order, named owner, plain language. A report that needs a consultant to explain it has failed at the only job it had.
Sources shown, or the claim does not get made
Every statistic on this site carries its source and year in visible text. If we cannot show you where a number came from, it does not appear — in a report, in a classroom, or on a web page.
The scope boundary holds under pressure
We will not quietly extend into engineering work to keep an engagement going. Fixed scope, quoted up front. If the next thing you need is outside the boundary, you get told, not billed.
Why you will not find the usual arc flash statistics on this site
The most repeated figure in this industry is that five to ten arc flash explosions occur every day in the United States. We traced it to its source. OSHA’s publication 4472-11 (2024) attributes it to NFPA and footnotes the Fire Protection Research Foundation report of March 2015 — and that report states that the origins of the estimate are unclear. The per-incident dollar figures and the burn-center admission counts that travel alongside it have no locatable primary source either.
So they are not here. A safety professional’s signature is worth exactly as much as the weakest claim under it, and frightening a client with a number nobody can source is not a service. Where the federal data does exist — and for arc flash specifically, as a distinct category, it largely does not — we cite it, name the agency, and give the year.
Next step

Start with a conversation, not a proposal.

Tell us what you have — a program document, a study from three years ago, a training roster you are not sure about — and what is prompting the question. You will get a straight answer about whether this practice is the right one for it, including when it is not. Fixed scope, quoted up front.

Speak to Rick Hauf, CSP
(813) 725-0999
safety@arcflashcertification.com
Mon–Fri 8am–6pm ET · response within 24 hours
Contact the practice→
Nationwide — onsite and live virtual.
Arc Flash
Certification
An NFPA 70E and OSHA electrical safety compliance practice led by Rick Hauf, CSP. Procedural and auditing work only — we do not perform incident energy analysis studies or produce arc flash labels.
Services
Compliance Audits Electrical Safety Programs Energized Work Procedures
PPE Program
Training — onsite & virtual
Practice
About Rick Hauf, CSP
Scope of practice
DC electrical safety
Standards we work to
Contact the practice
Contact
(813) 725-0999
safety@arcflashcertification.com
Mon–Fri 8am–6pm ET
Onsite and live virtual, nationwide
© 2026 Arc Flash Certification · Rick Hauf, CSP · All rights reserved.
NFPA 70E 2027 Edition OSHA 29 CFR 1910 OSHA 29 CFR 1926